THE MACHINE THRESHOLD
Robotics / EXPLAINER / 2 MIN READ + OPTIONAL DEEP DIVE

How can the same wings swim and fly?

A bird-inspired robot must adapt to two very different surroundings—and negotiate the surface between them.

AI-assisted synthesis · Published 2026-09-21 · Updated & sources checked 2026-09-21
How we research and correct our work

The key question is how one wing system handles swimming, flight and the difficult crossing between them.

One machine, two surroundings

Flexible wings, adjustable flapping and strong actuation let a research robot move through water and air. A July 2026 study by Raphael Zufferey and colleagues reports swimming, flight and transitions between them. The design investigates how a single wing system can serve both environments. [1]

Conceptual illustration of a mechanical birdlike robot lifting above turquoise water on flexible membrane wings
AI-generated conceptual illustration, not the MIT/EPFL robot or a research photograph.

The surface is its own challenge

The paper’s abstract identifies wing properties and the angle of water exit as important. MIT’s account describes tests in a tank and Lake Geneva: wing size, flapping frequency and tail angle were varied to find workable combinations. Success depends on the combination, not merely adding waterproofing. [1] [2]

A demonstration, with another test ahead

MIT’s July report says testing in choppy water and wind remained future work. Ocean sampling is a proposed use, not a completed service. This is evidence of a locomotion mechanism under the tested conditions, not a guarantee that a robot could reliably return from any sea state. [2]

Go a little deeper

Optional reading · about 1 more minute

Follow the crossing

Hypothetical example: Imagine planning a shoreline survey. Write down three separate questions: can the vehicle reach the sample underwater, leave the water, and return through the air? A pass on the first question cannot substitute for observations of the other two. The transition belongs in the mission plan as a test of its own.

What would make the application convincing?

Our interpretation: A useful next demonstration would connect the movement to a complete measurement task: a specified payload, repeatable route, stated environmental conditions and a verified return. That is the evidence we would seek before describing the concept as a dependable survey tool.

Original sources

Attributed synthesis, not original reporting. Examples labeled hypothetical or illustrative are explanatory. Reviewing a source does not independently validate its findings.

  1. Zufferey and colleagues: aerial-aquatic locomotion ↗

    Science, July 9, 2026. Repository abstract and manuscript metadata reviewed September 21; PDF retrieval failed. No detailed performance or numerical reliability claim.

  2. MIT: flapping robot swims and flies ↗

    July 9, 2026. Full institutional report reviewed September 21; same research team, not independent replication.

Suggest a correction

Know someone who would find this interesting?

Share this story on Facebook ↗ ·

Follow on Facebook ↗ for story highlights and questions to explore next.

Where this question leads next

Follow new explainers and updates →